Page 18 - ELG2404 April Issue 489
P. 18

.
        ADVERTISEMENT FEATURE                                                              ADVERTISEMENT FEATURE


        The continuing need for human beings




               he ongoing Home Office English
               test scandal and the legal action
               launched by innocent international
        T students wrongly accused of
        cheating – as widely reported in national and
        overseas media in February this year – has
        focused attention once again on the human
        cost of acting on poorly verified evidence
        of test taker deception. It is a perfect
        illustration of what happens when academic
        misconduct, including fraud, goes unnoticed
        and is only discovered and investigated
        retrospectively.
          Unfortunately, however, organised
        fraud, systematic cheating and differing
        cultural attitudes to test taker behaviour
        continue to create major problems for
        universities each year when students who
        have engaged in academic misconduct are
        enrolled with insufficient language ability
        to successfully pursue their studies.  So,
        in order to ensure accurate, reliable and
        credible test results, academic misconduct
        needs to be systematically detected and
        dealt with.  However, this needs to be
        done in such a way as to ensure innocent
        test takers are not unjustly penalised at
        any point.
          Whilst the Password Skills Plus test was
        developed to deter, detect, and disqualify
        test taker cheating, our approach to at-
        home testing starts with the understanding
        (gained from over 15 years of running
        online English language tests) that most
        test takers are honest. The vast majority
        of test takers will be nervous at the start
        of their test. Then, as they grow in, or lose
        confidence their behaviour will change. By
        the end of the test, their conduct in the test
        environment may be significantly different to
        their behaviour at the start of the test. This
        means analysis of test taker behaviour plays a   up. Our compliance team are trained to   videos, using both humans and AI,
        vital role in detecting academic misconduct   notice any unusual behaviour that acts as   the videos are passed to the Password
        and, while Artificial Intelligence has its   an alert. These findings are regularly shared   compliance team who then review them
        place detecting specific actions – such as   with our proctoring partners, Meazure   again. In addition, and as a separate process,
        keystrokes and eye-tracking – our experience   Learning – who, of course, also share their   all test results are analysed, with attention
        shows us that humans are still much better   own new findings – and contribute to the   being given to patterns we have come to
        at holistically interpreting and evaluating   constant updating of proctoring systems   associate with cheating.
        human behaviour                     and procedures.                      Our compliance and IT teams work
          In order to deter, detect and disqualify                              together to ensure that test results only go
        cheating when it does happen, we have   2. Surveillance during the test session  into our validation portal – for universities
        created a workflow divided into three stages   Password Skills Plus tests are invigilated in   to verify test certificates – when we are sure
        which combine the strengths of both humans   their entirety by humans (live proctoring).   that they are accurate, reliable and credible.
        and AI:                             Tests are video recorded from before the test   If we are still unsure after all the above
                                            starts – when the test taker is going through   checks, we will instigate an online viva.
        1. Investigation prior to the test session   ID, environment and technical checks – to   For disqualified test takers, there is of course
        This would include passport and other   the very end of the test when the test taker   a robust appeals procedure which acts as a
        identity document authentication, thorough   closes the test down. Proctors will pause   final safety net.
        room scanning, and PC checks of both   testing and remind test takers of the rules   Our mission as a test provider is to ensure
        software and hardware. Our IT team work   if they spot suspicious behaviour and close   that each and every test result is a true
        tirelessly to identify, characterise and counter   tests down entirely if they see academic   reflection of the test taker’s ability on the
        potential new methods of cheating using   misconduct.                   day they were assessed so that Password
        IT. For example, the use of virtual machines                            Skills Plus test results always meet the
        to allow remote proxies to take the test   3. Analysis after the test session  stringent requirements of high stakes
        became popular in certain markets in 2023,   After our Proctoring partner, Meazure   university admissions whilst being fair
        so new checks were devised to pick these   Learning, have carefully reviewed test   to test takers.
        18                                                                                               April 2024
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23