Page 10 - ELG2107 Jul Issue 476
P. 10

RESEARCH NEWS                      .


        Measuring language learning success





        A new vocabulary list reflects how learners acquire additional words

        By Gillian Ragsdale
        The order  of words acquired  by
        non-native learners  is usually
        assumed to reflect word frequency                                                                         GLEN CARRIE ON UNSPLASH
        in the English language generally,
        but when Belgian researchers
        tested word recognition directly
        and compiled lists of word families
        reflecting  what  students  actually
        know, their lists suggested  other
        strong influences on which words
        are learned and in what order.
          There have been many attempts
        to compile  lists  of vocabulary
        appropriate  to various levels  of
        language  proficiency. These lists
        are often organised into levels of
        word families. For example,  the
        Common  European Framework
        of Reference (CEFR) has six
        proficiency levels (A1-C2).
          What these lists  have in
        common is that they’re compiled
        from the top down by researchers
        using word frequency  to decide
        at which language learning level
        those words/word families should
        be known.
          The Belgian study took a very
        different, bottom-up  approach,
        testing language learners directly
        to find  out which words  they   tongues and all educational levels,   child-friendly vocabulary, such as   These lists, being derived from
        actually know.             with a mean age of 30. The most   ‘tadpole’ and ‘dunce’.  what learners actually know, can
          An internet test was  made   common mother tongues were   The list  of 62,000 words were   help teachers and examiners
        freely available (see below), with   Polish,  Hungarian,  German,  organised  into  20,000-word  to assess text difficulty more
        each testing round comprising 70   Polish, Dutch and Chinese.  families,  which is  a more useful   realistically and better anticipate
        random, real English words and   Analysing the responses  led   compilation  for teachers and   challenges, such as otherwise
        30 random, made-up but plausible   to a ranked list of 62,000 words.   learners  (see  link below). The   unexpected gaps in vocabulary
        words. The participants answered   Of these, 114 were known to all   families were ranked by the best-  knowledge.
        yes/no,  indicating recognition   participants, but were still ranked   known member of the family, and   The vocabulary test can be
        of the word, while the inclusion    by responding time (eg, nouns   include inflections and derivations   found at http://vocabulary.ugent.be
        of the nonsense words weeded out   in ranked order: ‘coffee, water,   based on suffixes. For example,   Wordlists are available at OSF |
        those who  claimed to  recognise   music, radio’ etc). Some less   the family ‘correction’ includes   Word levels for English L2 speakers
        words falsely.             frequent, language-class  related   ‘correctly’ and ‘corrective’,  but   based on accuracy and response
          Participants were also asked for   words also appear  on this list:   not ‘incorrect’.    times in a yes/no vocabulary test
        personal information, including   ‘subject, verb, vocabulary’.  A   Overall,  English  language  with 62 thousand words.
        choosing from five proficiency   further 331 words had only one   word frequency was  only able to   The lists are copyright protected
        levels, from ‘I know a few words’   ‘no’ response.    account for 46% of the variance   under the Creative Commons
        to ‘It is my mother tongue’.   Some words would not have   in the likelihood that learners   license  CC BY-NC (Attribution-
        Feedback scores were given and   been  predicted  from  their  knew a word.     NonCommercial).  They  can
        the test proved very  popular,   frequency in the English language   Apart  from  academic-related   be  used  freely  for  research  and
        generating  17 million responses   generally and some were even   biases  in  vocabulary,  other  education, but not for commercial
        for the study.             better  known in English than   influences include the motivation   puposes.
          Many more responses  were   in the first language.  These   of the learner and how interesting
        actually collected, but only the   latter tended  to be academic   the vocabulary is to  them.   REFERENCE
        first three tested by each user were   words, such as ‘informatics’,  and   This may explain why so many   ■ Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E. and
        used (some users tested hundreds   cognates from the mother tongue   learners  knew words  such as   Mandera, P. (2021), ‘Which words
        of times) and anyone answering   or other second language, such as   ‘snowboarding’ and ‘sexy’. It is   do English non-native speakers
        ‘yes’ more than  twice to the   ‘paracetamol’.        also likely that sources of English   know? New supernational levels
        nonsense words was excluded.   Words that were comparatively   outside the classroom,  such as    based on yes/no decision’. Second
          Participant profiles  were  very   less  well-known  than expected   TV, film and social media, are   Language Research  https://doi.
        diverse, representing 150 mother   included more informal and   highly influential.  org/10.1177/0267658320934526
        10                                                                                               July 2021
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15