Page 20 - ELG1807 July Issue 459
P. 20

COMMENT                .





              COMMENT               .




                    here is a common belief among EFL
                    teachers that the miserable terms
                    and conditions faced by many are
              Ta result of rich money-grabbing   Cheap
              language school owners.
                Outside of the current boom markets
              such as China and Vietnam, this is unlikely
              to be the case.
                In mature unregulated markets with easy
              access to native-speaker workers – such
              as Spain or Thailand – private language
              schools are predominately family-owned
              single centres or small regional chains.         but
                The market is seasonal, the hours of
              opening restricted and profit margins low.
                Without an unending supply of cheap
              migrant workers in the form of young
              native-speakers happy to work for low
              wages for a couple of years, many of these
              businesses would collapse.
                This is not an easy market to make a
              fortune in. Though some people have.
                Take Bertil Hult, the Swedish student
              who founded a little language travel agency,
              EF Education First, in the basement of his
              university residence in 1965.
                The private company, now run by his
              sons, has branched out from language travel
              to own language schools, an international
              franchise, boarding schools, pathway
              programmes, business schools, to name but
              a few.
                In 2015 Forbes magazine estimated his
              personal fortune at $5 billion.
                Hult may be the only billionaire to get his
              start in English language teaching but there
              are a number of other multi-millionaires:
              Shane Lipscombe, who opened his first
              language school in Japan in 1977, and
              Khalid Mahmood who co-founded Apollo
              in Vietnam in 1994, for example.
                So what differentiates their chains from
              the ‘mom and pop’ businesses that dominate
              the industry, at least in Europe?
                Well, they’re known for looking after   they think of is English teaching.   flee graduate unemployment at home for
              their teachers and offering them career   After all, what other work are they going   the chance to work for peanuts while they
              prospects, but not for lavishing money on   to get, since they are unlikely to speak any   polish up their English.
              them.                               other languages?                     And what about the 70,000 international
                What makes them different is that they   When you tell them they ought to be   students who head to the US every year to
              all got into the market early and they all   trained, they are often surprised. And,   work in low-paid summer jobs?
              diversified outside the local language school   unless there is a recession at home or they   Does all this mean that English language
              business.                                                              teachers should put up with the poor wages
                Above all, they all understood that sales         The hard reality is that   and terrible conditions that they currently
              and marketing are much more important in                               face? Of course not.
              building educational brands than providing   the business model for      It’s just means they are more likely to be
              better-than-average teaching.          language schools relies         successful in regulated growth markets like
                The hard reality is that the business                                Ireland, where better teacher terms and
              model for language schools relies not on the   not on the quality of the   conditions can help good language schools
              quality of the teaching but on the quality of   teaching but on the quality   keep cheap competitors out by raising the
              the salesmanship.                                                      cost of entry.
                Parents, companies and governments still   of the salesmanship         If the market you are working in is
              believe that the only thing required to learn                          stagnating, move to a market that isn’t.
              a language is a native-speaker.                                          Teachers are more likely to be successful
                Trained ones are nice, experienced ones   need a particular qualification to get a   when they unionise and take on the big
              are nicer, but not nice enough to pay more   visa, they will go for the cheapest quickest   chains rather than going after the smaller
              money for.                          option. It should not come as a surprise.  family operations.
                Worse still, most native-speakers believe   After all, waves of European graduates   If you are working in a school with no
              the same thing. If an English speaker wants   have kept the hospitality industry going   career prospects, move to a big chain that
              to work abroad for a while, the first thing   in Britain and Ireland for years, as they   has some and just keep moving.
              20                                                                                               July 2018



         p20-21.indd   2                                                                                         7/9/2018   10:12:09 AM
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25