Page 10 - ELG1807 July Issue 459
P. 10

RESEARCH NEWS                      .


                       Krash ‘n’ burn: Does this study



                disprove famous language learning


                                                       theory?



























              New research taking on the ‘input hypothesis’ finds that speaking in L2 helps
              improve understanding

              By Federica Tedeschi       speech production. Studies have   might not seem that big, but a word
              Students who are required to   already shown that retrieval is more   in natural speech is typically shorter   WHAT IS KRASHEN’S
              produce speech in L2 appear   effective for vocabulary learning.  than half a second,’ Hopman   ‘INPUT HYPOTHESIS’?
              to  improve  their  language  The authors hypothesised that   pointed out.        In 1977, linguist Stephen
              comprehension faster than learners   ‘these  same  production processes   ‘A person who is falling behind    Krashen published his
              who only practise comprehension,   would be especially helpful for   when hearing a sentence is at a real   theory saying that language
              according to a study from the   language learning beyond the single   disadvantage.’  learning is driven by the
              University of Wisconsin-Madison   word level...’        The artificial language used in   comprehensible input that
              in the US.                   ‘Our work is the first to relate   the experiment had a strict word   learners are exposed to.
                 Lead researcher Elise Hopman   production to learning of the   order as well as a morphemic   Understanding spoken and
              told the Gazette that these findings   grammar of a foreign language,’   system based on suffixes requiring   written language input is
              were in contrast with ‘Krashen’s   Hopman told EL Gazette.  grammatical agreement.   seen as the only mechanism
                                                                                                that results in the increase
              influential input hypothesis, which   The researchers recruited two   Materials consisted of a cartoon   of underlying linguistic
              focuses on comprehension as the   groups of around 60 English native-  world of monsters situated on   competence, and language
              main (and only) way for a learner   speaker  undergraduates.  Both  alien landscapes, which included   output is not seen as having
              to really learn the grammar of a   groups studied the same artificial   both still pictures and short videos.   any effect on learners’
              language.’                 language, which was presented to   Although there was no explicit   ability. The hypothesis is still
                The importance of production   both using the same videos and   grammar teaching, the sentence   popular in the United States,
              in L1 has also recently been   pictures.              structures were built up gradually   where Krashen is now the
              highlighted in a study of language   However, while one group was   from word to sentence level.  professor
              ability among toddlers, reported in   only asked to comprehend the   Members of the comprehension   emeritus at
                                                                                                the University
              the March Gazette.         language, by matching a sentence to   group were asked to recognise the   of Southern
                Again, contrary to the input   a picture, the other was required to   right sentence describing a picture,   California.
              hypothesis, it found that toddlers’   produce the language by describing   and the accuracy of their response
              ability was based on the number of   the pictures.    was immediately presented on   comprehension  performance’,
              interactions between parent and   Both groups then took a number   screen.      according to the researchers. They
              child, not the number of words the   of comprehension tests.   Production participants were   attributed the better performance
              child was exposed to.        The production group did   shown a picture and asked to   from the production group to  the
                The authors of the latest   better in both accuracy and speed.   generate the description in the new   need to recall known grammar,
              study, who have a background   They were ‘significantly more   language themselves; responses   retrieve lexis from long-term
              in cognitive psychology and   accurate than participants who got   were recorded and participants   memory and plan the utterance.
              neuroscience; rather than second   comprehension training,’ the paper   could listen to the right answer after
              language learning, were influenced   stated.          having produced a phrase. The   n Production Practice during
              by memory theory. This describes   Production-trained participants   results  showed that ‘production   Language Learning Improves
              the difference between recognition,   were up to half a second faster than   practice wouldn’t just strengthen   Comprehension, Elise W. M.
              used in comprehension, and   participants from the other group.  people’s production performance   Hopman, Maryellen C. MacDonald
              retrieval, which is needed for   ‘To a lay person, half a second   but could actually yield stronger   http://lcnl.wisc.edu/elise-hopman/
              10                                                                                               July  2018



         p10-11.indd   2                                                                                         7/9/2018   3:27:20 PM
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15