Page 12 - ELG1801 Jan Issue 453
P. 12

RESEARCH NEWS                      .



              By Claudia Civinini
              Bilingualism could help protect
              children’s brain development from
              the negative effects of growing
              up in poverty, researchers at the
              University of Oregon said.
                ‘We  know  that  [children
              from   lower  socio-economic
              backgrounds] are at risk of not
              developing  cognitive  abilities
              that are important for academic
              success at the same pace as higher
              socio-economic background peers,’
              leading author Jimena Santillan
              told the  Gazette. ‘I was interested
              to study whether bilingualism could
              be a protective factor for children
              growing up in these conditions’.
                Researchers say that children
              growing up in poor families are
              at risk of their executive function
              being underdeveloped by the time
              they reach pre-school – and are
              more likely to find it hard to listen
              or behave appropriately in class.
                Santillan’s study found that
              pupils who were or were becoming                                                      Inhibitory control was
              bilingual showed a faster growth                                          checked with a ‘pencil-tapping test’
              in their  ability to  regulate their
              behaviour than their monolingual
                This ability – known as inhibitory  Can bilingualism combat the
              counterparts.
              control – is the skill of suppressing
              an  instinctive  response  and  cognitive effects of poverty?
              selecting a more appropriate one –
              for example, focusing on a lesson
              instead of chatting with classmates.   Pre-school bilinguals are better at regulating behaviour,
                This is important for academic
              success, but social development  despite poor backgrounds
              too, explained Santillan.
                Other studies have found   when the examiner tapped twice,   exceeded that of monolinguals  to corroborate that the bilingual
              similar results, but this is the   and vice versa. Success in this task   and was comparable to that of  advantage is a real thing,’ she said.
              first longitudinal study involving   depends on the ability to suppress   their bilingual peers. Bilinguals  ‘But provided that more research
              children from a lower socio-  the instinct to imitate the examiner   outperformed both monolingual  does support our findings, the
              economic  background,  the  while at the same time keeping in   and transition groups. According  existence of a bilingual advantage
              researchers say.           mind the rules of the task.  to the authors, this signals that the  – particular in children from lower
                The research analysed data   Results were compared across   length of the bilingual experience is  socio economic background – could
              from 1146 pre-schoolers from   three groups: English monolinguals,   a driving factor in the differences in  have implications.’
              either English or Spanish-speaking   English-Spanish bilinguals, and   IC development. The study is part   Santillan said that for example
              backgrounds. Their development of   Spanish monolinguals learning   of the ongoing research into the  families could be encouraged to raise
              inhibitory control was tested three   English – this last group was tested   bilingual advantage hypothesis. This  children as bilinguals. ‘We are doing
              times over 18 months during the   in Spanish in the first two tests.  is the idea that bilinguals, having to  the study in the context of the US,
              transition period from preschool to   Controlling for a range of   continually juggle between their  where there are a lot of immigrant
              kindergarten.              variables, including socio-economic   languages – selecting the relevant  families who tend to dismiss their
                The data was drawn from the   status, age and language proficiency,   language and suppressing the other  own language in favour of English –
              longitudinal Family and Child   the study found that children in the   one – reap cognitive benefits that  we could encourage families to keep
              Experiences Survey 2009, which   bilingual and ‘transition’ groups   go beyond the language domain.   their own language and to raise
              focused on children participating in   showed a faster development of   This could have important  children as bilingual,’ she explained.
              the Head Start programme, a pre-  inhibitory control than those in the   implications for policy makers and  If further research supports these
              school preparatory programme for   monolingual group.   educationalists, but more research  findings,  bilingual  education
              disadvantaged families in the US.  Children in the transition   is needed, said Santillan.  could almost be considered ‘an
                Inhibitory control was checked   group showed lower inhibitory   ‘The research is inconsistent  intervention to foster this protective
              with a ‘pencil-tapping test’. Children   control performance in the first   on bilingual advantage. A lot of  factor for cognitive development’,
              were asked to tap the pencil once   test, but their rate of development   research is still needed to be able  Santillan added.






              12                                                                                  December / January 2018
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17