Page 10 - ELG1705 May Issue 447
P. 10

RESEARCH NEWS





             Debunked






             ‘learning styles’




             theory still part of




             gold-standard EFL qualifications





            But Cambridge English has now pledged to remove

            the phrase from Celta and Delta syllabuses




             By: Claudia Civinini
                      ambridge English Language As-  of learning styles, saying it is ‘a concept which   Professor Paul Kirschner from the Open
                      sessment has been referring to the   teachers should be aware of, alongside other   Universiteit in the Netherlands – a vocal
                      concept of ‘learning styles’ in its   concepts’, and that teachers should use ‘a   opponent of the theory – compared it to as-
                      Celta and Delta EFL qualifications   variety of teaching methods’. (See response   trology or homeopathy. ‘No one would think
            Ceven though the theory has long     below.)                            that doctors should be trained in homeopa-
             been debunked by academics, it has emerged.  The theory says students learn best   thy,’ he said. ‘Urban legends such as learning
               The Cambridge English Teaching Frame-  if taught in their preferred style – most   styles should not be part of the curriculum for
             work, which underpins the two qualifications,   commonly visual, auditory or kinaesthetic,   teachers.’
             contains references to learning styles – ‘visual,   although an ‘olfactory’ variant exists.  In March the Guardian newspaper pub-
             auditory, kinaesthetic’ – under the competency   Authors and Celta and Delta teacher train-  lished a letter signed by thirty educational
             area ‘understanding learners’.      ers Carol Lethaby and Patricia Harries told   psychologists and neuroscientists, including
               Teacher trainers have confirmed that   the Gazette that some teachers now openly   four from Cambridge, insisting that there
             trainees on these courses have been required to   express their disagreement with the theory in   was no evidence to back the idea of learning
             show an awareness of their students’ learn-  their course assignments, but the majority still   styles.
             ing style, both in their assignments and their   believe in it.          Trinity College London removed references
             teaching practice.                   According to a recent survey they conduct-  to learning styles from its Tesol syllabuses and
               When the Gazette raised the issue, Cam-  ed on 342 teachers across the US, Mexico,   assessment criteria in 2016. The decision was
             bridge English – a department of the Univer-  Brazil and Canada, 90 per cent of teachers   motivated by the lack of supporting evidence
             sity of Cambridge – said it was in the process   still believe in the learning styles theory,   for the theory and by the awareness of its po-
             of updating its course documentation, adding   despite it being frequently debunked.  tential detrimental effect on student learning,
             that it would remove the phrase ‘learning   This could be due to the fact that, beyond   said Ben Beaumont, Trinity Tesol qualification
             styles’ and replace it with ‘learning preferenc-  Cambridge English, many teacher training   manager. References to learning styles in the
             es’. Cambridge English explained its inclusion   programmes across the world make reference   syllabuses have been substituted with ‘ways of
                                                 to the theory.                     learning’ and ‘learning strategies’.
             One-style-per-student concept is ‘reductive and limiting’



               Evelina Galaczi, head of   ‘We believe that a prescriptive   used to capture the fact that this   varied teaching ‘toolbox’ which
             research strategy at Cambridge   one-style-per-student concept   concept is not a simple binary   personalises teaching to individual
             English, explained why the   is reductive and limiting. This   dichotomy or a finite set of styles.   needs, wants and preferences,
             concept of ‘learning styles’ was   is reflected in our materials and   ‘We see learning preferences   without being reductive. Our
             included in their teacher training   qualifications, which recommend   as a core idea within adaptive/  approach is also based on a
             syllabuses.                that teachers use a variety of   personalised learning and   belief that learners exist in four
               ‘In the Cambridge English   teaching methods rather than   differentiated teaching. Different   intersecting worlds of learning:
             Teaching Framework and in the   link specific learning methods to   learning materials and teaching   personal, educational, social and
             Celta/Delta syllabuses, we refer   specific learning styles. We are   approaches add value to   assessment, and the notion of
             to “learning styles” as a concept   currently updating our public   learners in different ways, and   learning preferences provides
             which teachers should be aware   documentation and the term   the most effective and efficient   insights into their personal and
             of, alongside other concepts.    “learning preferences” will be   learning is achieved through a   educational worlds.’

              10                                                                                              May 2017



        p10-11CLAUDIA.indd   2                                                                                 4/27/2017   12:54:30 PM
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15