Page 7 - ELG1601 Nov Issue 441
P. 7

ELyoung learners















                                                                  An EL Gazette supplement with the British Council: English language and international education • 2016

                    highlight a positive  Creating a Clil controversy?

                    hile many studies

             Wlink between bilin-
             gual  programmes  (Clil)  and
             foreign language learning, it is   Claudia Civinini reports on a controversial new study investigating bilingual education in
             not yet clear what impact these
             programmes have on the learn- Spain, while Bilingual Teaching Association president and study authors join the discussion
             ing of the actual content of a
             subject course taught in a for-
             eign language.             In academic  year 2013–14   experience) and balanced distribu-  the OECD’s Pisa exam, it does   schools after the introduction of   first and the second cohort of stu-
              This is the focus of a 2016   schools in the autonomous region   tion of selected schools between   not have academic consequences.   the programme, particularly for   dents, starting in 2004 and 2005
             research paper authored by Pro-  of Madrid introduced a bilingual   different geographical areas.  As   Exams are conducted with ques-  children  whose  parents  had  less   respectively, with the latter show-
             fessor  Antonio Cabrales from   programme whereby 40 per cent   of 2005 the third criterion was   tions in Spanish for all students,   than upper-secondary educa-  ing  a  slight  improvement.  The
             University  College  London,  of instruction,  including all the   changed to ‘English level of the   whether or not they attend a   tion. Reading and mathematics,   researchers asked if this was due
             Professor Jesus Carro of the Uni-  science curriculum, was taught   teachers in the school’.   bilingual school. The exams test   taught in Spanish, did not show   to the effect of the new applica-
             versidad Carlos III de Madrid,   in English. Schools had to apply   The  researchers  analysed  mathematics, reading (literacy in   significant  differences.  The  tion criterion (the language level
             and Professor Brindusa  Anghel   to implement the programme.   the results of the Prueba de   Spanish) and general knowledge.   demographics also changed in   of the teachers) introduced that
             from the Universidad Autonoma   The original call for applica-  Conoscimientos  y  Destrezas  According to the study, general   schools after the introduction of   year and if improved language
             de Madrid, three economists   tions, which  selected 25  schools   Indispensables (CDI).  This is a   knowledge includes content areas   the bilingual programme, with an   proficiency for teachers was
             whose research areas include the   (later scaled up to 316), required   standardised compulsory exam   taught in English in bilingual   increase in the number of children   linked to better student learning
             economics of education and who   institutions to fulfil three criteria:   for all sixth-grade students (age   schools, though Spanish bilingual   whose parents had university   in the foreign language.
             have a track record of research   degree of acceptance of the edu-  12) that tests the skills and knowl-  teaching specialists dispute this   degrees and were in professional   The paper generated contro-
             papers about education published   cational community, feasibility of   edge that should be acquired by   (see comment).  The research-  occupations, characteristics that   versy in the Spanish press (see
             in peer-reviewed journals.  the application (staff, resources,   the end of primary school. Like   ers  analysed  the  results  of  the   are positively correlated with   page 2 of the main  Gazette).
                                                                                           test in bilingual schools before   academic performance.  We asked  the president of  the
                                                                                           and after they became bilingual,   The study offers various ave-  Bilingual  Teaching Associa-
              Spain’s Bilingual Teaching Association president                             and used the results that non-  nues  for  further  investigation.   tion in Spain, Xavier Gisbert, to
              Xavier Gisbert (pictured) comments                                           bilingual schools obtained in the   The  three  researchers  point  out   comment on the findings – and
                                                                                           same academic years as a control   there are two factors to consider,   the authors of the paper then
              Economists are normally very good in their   only a part of the Spanish language exam.  group. The data collected from the   as the bilingual programme could   responded to his comments.
              field but know very little about education.   However, the authors state  that gen-  exams also included information   affect both students’ ability to   See the full study: Carro, J.,
              The study is based on the academic results   eral culture is taught  in  English and is   about students’ background, such   learn the subject course content   Cabrales, A., & Anghel, B. (2012),
              obtained at the end of primary education   the equivalent of the content of science,   as country of origin and parental   and to perform a test in their   Evaluating a bilingual educa-
              by the students that started the Madrid   which  is not  the case. Taking this into   education levels.  native language when the subject   tion program in Spain: the impact
              bilingual  programme  in  2004  and  2005.   account, it is clear that the study, which   The analysis found that results   was taught in a foreign language.   beyond foreign language learn-
              The authors use the data obtained from   compares results between bilingual and   in the general knowledge test   Findings also pointed to a dif-  ing. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/
              CDI exam taken by all students in Madrid   non-bilingual  schools,  is  based  on  a   actually worsened for bilingual   ference between the results of the   doi/10.1111/ecin.12305/full   n
              in  their  last  year  of  primary  education.   false premise, which makes it invalid.
              This is not a high-reliability test, therefore   In any case, the study found no signifi-
              results can be compared between schools   cant difference in the CDI results between
              within the same year but not between dif-  students from bilingual and non-bilingual
              ferent years in the same school.      schools. It found a slight negative effect in
                In Madrid’s bilingual schools any sub-  the group of children who started in 2004
              ject can be taught in English                   – which disappears in 2005 –
              except Spanish and mathemat-                    except perhaps for children
              ics. The CDI includes only two                  whose parents have less than
              subjects: Spanish and math-                     upper-secondary education.
              ematics.  The  Spanish  exam                    But in general these children
              consists of dictation, text                     have  worse  results.  Taking
              comprehension  and  general                     into account that none of the
              culture, or general knowledge                   subjects taught in English
              as it’s in known in the UK. Gen-                has been analysed, the study
              eral culture is not a subject                   has little to do with bilingual
              taught in primary schools – it is               education.


              Study authors respond (Antonio Cabrales pictured)

              Perhaps it is true the exam is not reliable   public record.
              (although  we do not know of any evi-   The study found insignificant effects in
              dence about this), but the way we analyse   those exams where the content was taught
              the data will not suffer from any potential   entirely in Spanish. It found very signifi-
              problem  coming  from inconsistencies   cant negative results for both children that
              across years. Precisely because of that   started  in  2004  and  those  that  started  in
              potential  problem, we do not simply   2005 for the exams where the content was
              compare raw grades of a single school   taught largely in English for the bilingual
              from one year  to the other, nor do we   schools.  This  significant negative  effect
              compare results across  schools within   was on the average student.
              the same year, because they can (and we   Then  we  divided  the  sample between
              found evidence that they do) have differ-  children  with  high  and  low  educational
              ent students. What we can definitely do   status of  the parents and  discovered
              is compare the relative positions in the   that, by comparing children whose par-
              within-year distribution of the schools in   ents had low education both in bilingual
              the treated and control groups.                and non-bilingual schools, the
                Even though it was adminis-                  negative effect came  mostly
              trated in the same exam sheets                 from those children. It is true
              as  part  of  the  ‘language  and              that those children have gen-
              general culture exam’ it is most               erally worse results but we
              definitely the case that a large               are  comparing children with
              part of that exam refers to the                less-educated parents in both
              content of the subject of ‘knowl-              types of schools, so the effect
              edge of the environment’, which                cannot  come from low-edu-
              puts together social and natural               cated parents, which are held
              science. The exams are in the                  constant across groups.


              Inside your 4-page Young Learners supplement:

                                 The ‘missing middle’ mystery p ii
                                 Prime time for pre-primary p ii
                                 On board for excellence (left) p iii
                                 Why families lead the way p iii
                                 Navigating education (right) p iv




        p06-07_ELG1116.indd   2                                                                                                                                 10/21/2016   6:41:33 PM
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12